The gig economy in New Zealand provides income for thousands of workers and serves more than a million consumers, but recent court rulings have thrown the legal framework for platform work into serious doubt. The Court of Appeal classified four Uber drivers as employees rather than independent contractors, and the Employment Court confirmed a delivery app driver was also an employee. Those decisions put pressure on platforms that rely on contractor models, and they raised questions about pay, leave, and protections that affect hundreds of thousands of people.
Disclosure: Some links on this page are affiliate links. If you make a purchase through them, Britwealth may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. We only include products and services that are relevant to the topic.
This article is general information only and does not constitute professional advice. For your specific situation, consult a qualified professional.
The Government has responded with a proposed four-part “gateway test” to clarify contractor status, but unions argue the current laws still don’t go far enough to protect platform workers. The question at the centre of this debate is straightforward: does the gig economy offer genuine flexibility and opportunity, or does it create a two-tier system where some workers miss out on basic employment rights?
The way this gets resolved will affect how platforms operate, how workers are paid, and how businesses use contractors across New Zealand. The decisions being made now in Parliament and the courts are setting the rules for the next decade of work. For a broader look at how New Zealand businesses are handling structural change, the disruption challenge facing NZ businesses covers similar ground. Here’s what you actually need to know.
What the Gateway Test Means for Contractor Status in NZ
The term at the centre of this debate is the gateway test — a four-part legal test the Government has proposed to determine whether a worker is genuinely an independent contractor or should be treated as an employee. It sits alongside existing court-developed tests and applies to platform workers and conventional contractors alike.
What I notice is that the gap between what the courts are saying and what the platforms are doing is creating real risk for businesses that use contractors without checking their status. The gateway test is designed to close that gap, but it won’t resolve every case. For a related angle on how NZ businesses are adapting to new ways of working, the shift toward remote work in NZ touches on similar flexibility-versus-protection tensions.
What Happens When Worker Status Is Misclassified
The Court of Appeal’s decision that four Uber drivers should be classified as employees means platforms could be required to pay minimum wage, holiday pay, and other entitlements they currently don’t offer. If the ruling stands, it could apply to thousands of workers in similar arrangements across the country.
For businesses that use contractors, the financial risk is real. A worker who looks like a contractor but operates like an employee can claim employment rights, potentially leading to back-pay claims for holiday pay, minimum wage, and other entitlements. The Employment Court confirmed this pattern when it ruled that a delivery app driver was an employee because the driver was required to accept minimum hours, could not delegate work, and was not allowed to work for competing platforms.
The distinction matters because employees get minimum wage, holiday pay, sick leave, and KiwiSaver contributions, while contractors get none of those. The gateway test aims to provide clarity, but it won’t resolve every case. Workers who are tightly integrated into a platform’s operations — with little autonomy and no ability to subcontract — are most likely to be classified as employees.
Where the Current System Leaves Platform Workers Vulnerable
Relying on a contract label alone
Many platforms assume that a written contract stating “contractor” is enough to determine status. The courts have made it clear that the actual working relationship matters more than the label. A contract that says “contractor” but requires exclusive availability, set hours, and performance monitoring will likely be treated as an employment relationship. The gateway test includes a written contract as one of four conditions, but it’s only one part of the test.
Requiring exclusivity and controlling availability
The delivery app driver in the Employment Court case was not permitted to work for competing platforms. That factor alone weighed heavily in the court’s decision. The gateway test addresses this directly — one of its four conditions is that there must be no restriction on working for competitors. Platforms that lock workers into exclusive arrangements are creating evidence of employment, not contractor status.
Monitoring performance and imposing discipline
When a platform monitors performance, imposes discipline, or requires minimum hours, it looks like an employer. The delivery app driver was subject to discipline and performance monitoring, which the court cited as evidence of employment. The gateway test doesn’t directly address performance monitoring, but the existing court tests still apply alongside it.
Not allowing substitution or delegation
A genuine contractor can send someone else to do the work. The delivery app driver could not delegate or substitute another person, which the court saw as a strong indicator of employment. The gateway test’s third condition — no requirement for specific availability unless subcontracting is allowed — directly targets this issue.
→ Scroll right to see all columns
| Factor | Independent Contractor | Employee |
|---|---|---|
| Written contract stating contractor status | Yes | Not relevant |
| Restriction on working for competitors | No | Yes |
| Requirement for specific availability | No | Yes |
| Ability to subcontract or delegate | Yes | No |
| Performance monitoring and discipline | No | Yes |
| Minimum hours requirement | No | Yes |
| Contract terminable for declining tasks | No | Yes |
How the Gateway Test Reshapes Contractor Status in NZ
The four conditions of the gateway test
The Government’s proposed amendment to the Employment Relations Act 2000 introduces a four-part test. A worker is treated as a contractor if all four conditions are met: a written contract stating contractor status; no restriction on working for competitors; no requirement for specific availability unless subcontracting is allowed; and the contract cannot be terminated for declining additional tasks. Each condition is designed to match the realities of platform work, where workers often choose when and how much to work.
How the test applies to platform workers
The gateway test aligns closely with how many platforms already operate. Drivers and delivery workers typically log in and out at their own discretion, can work for multiple apps, and are not penalised for declining individual trips. For those workers, the test should confirm contractor status. But the test also applies to conventional contractor relationships, such as courier companies and subcontractors, if they meet the same criteria. Platforms that restrict availability, require exclusivity, or penalise workers for declining tasks will find the test harder to pass.
What the test doesn’t cover — existing court tests still apply
The gateway test operates alongside existing court-developed tests for contractor status, not instead of them. That means a worker who doesn’t pass the gateway test can still argue they are a contractor under the broader legal framework. And a worker who does pass the test can still be found to be an employee if the actual working relationship looks like employment. The courts have the final say, and the gateway test is a tool for clarity, not a guarantee.
Upcoming changes — what to watch for in 2025 and beyond
Parliament has amended the Employment Relations Act to address modern work arrangements, but the gateway test is still being finalised. Unions have submitted proposals for stronger protections, including collective bargaining rights for gig workers, and the Government has indicated it will consider those submissions. The legislation aims to keep New Zealand at the forefront of balancing innovation with worker protection, but the details matter. Platforms and businesses that use contractors should watch for the final wording of the gateway test and any transitional provisions that may apply.
If you’re unsure whether your current contractor arrangements meet the new test, a legal review of your contracts and worker relationships can help identify where the risks sit before the rules change.
Frequently Asked Questions About Gig Work and Worker Rights in NZ
Can a platform worker be fired for not accepting trips? ▾
Does the gateway test apply to all contractors or just gig workers? ▾
What happens if a platform doesn’t meet the gateway test conditions? ▾
Can a gig worker still be an employee even if they pass the gateway test? ▾
Are unions involved in the gateway test legislation? ▾
Do consumers benefit from the gateway test? ▾
The Future of Gig Work in NZ Depends on Getting Classification Right
The gateway test is a genuine attempt to balance flexibility with protection, but it’s not a magic solution. Court rulings will continue to test the boundaries, and the platforms that adapt early — by reviewing their contracts, removing exclusivity clauses, and allowing genuine flexibility — will be in a stronger position when the rules settle. The ones that wait for a court case to force the issue are taking a real financial gamble.
Remember: this article is general information only. For advice on your specific situation, speak to a qualified professional.
If this was useful, you might also want to read How to Take Advantage of Government Incentives for Small Businesses in New Zealand.
Sources and Further Reading
Decoding Consumer Trends: What NZ Households Actually Want — Understanding what drives consumer demand in the gig economy and beyond.
Is Remote Work the New Norm for NZ Businesses? — How flexibility in work arrangements is reshaping the NZ labour market.
NZ Initiative (2024). Parliament takes the wheel on contractor rules. 🔗
Stuff (2023). Delivery app driver employee status. 🔗
Stuff (2023). Gig economy union advocacy and dispute resolution. 🔗
RNZ (2024). Gig economy uncertainty for platform workers. 🔗
RNZ (2024). Gig economy consumer benefits. 🔗
