Every year, around 366,000 young people in the UK finish their compulsory education without the financial skills they need to manage their money. That figure comes from the Money and Pensions Service (MaPS), and it means a huge chunk of each school-leaving cohort enters adulthood without knowing how to budget, save, or handle debt. In cash terms, that gap shows up quickly — in missed bill payments, unaffordable credit, and savings accounts that never get opened.
Disclosure: Some links on this page are affiliate links. If you make a purchase through them, Britwealth may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. We only include products and services that are relevant to the topic.
This article is general information only and does not constitute professional advice. For your specific situation, consult a qualified professional.
The numbers paint a clear picture. A 2023 study by Compare the Market and MyBnk surveyed around 4,000 young adults and 645 teachers, and found that only 41% of young adults were financially literate. Those who did receive financial education at school got roughly 48 minutes of it per month — far short of the 30 hours researchers calculated as the minimum needed for 11–18-year-olds to become financially literate. The gap between what’s taught and what’s needed is wide, and it’s costing young people real money from the moment they start earning.
Here’s what you actually need to know.
The central concept here is meaningful financial education — not just a one-off lesson on budgeting, but sustained, structured teaching that builds real money skills over time. The MaPS survey found that only 47% of children received this in 2022, down from 48% in 2019. Children who had both school and home financial education — just 10% of those surveyed — showed noticeably better money management and attitudes toward saving.
What the curriculum actually covers across the UK
Financial education is not the same everywhere in the UK. Each nation sets its own curriculum, and the differences matter for what children actually learn. England only requires it at secondary level, while Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland start earlier. But even where it’s on paper, delivery is patchy.
→ Scroll right to see all columns
| Nation | Age range covered | Where it sits in curriculum |
|---|---|---|
| England | Secondary only (ages 11–16) | Citizenship and maths |
| Wales | Primary and secondary (rolled out 2022) | Maths and health and wellbeing |
| Scotland | Ages 3–14 | Maths and numeracy (broad general education) |
| Northern Ireland | Ages 4–14 | Maths, personal development, learning for life and work |
The table shows that England is the only nation that doesn’t require financial education before secondary school. That matters because 44% of teachers surveyed by MaPS said financial education should start between ages 5 and 7, and 26% said it should begin in nursery. The later it starts, the more ground there is to make up — and the current 48 minutes per month in secondary school isn’t enough to do it.
Where the system falls short — and what’s being missed
The research points to several specific breakdowns in how financial education is delivered. These aren’t abstract problems — they have direct consequences for what young people can and can’t do with their money when they leave school.
Teachers don’t know it’s required
The APPG survey of 401 teachers in 2022 found that over two-fifths of secondary teachers were unaware that financial education was a curriculum requirement. If the people delivering it don’t know it’s supposed to be there, it’s not getting taught. The MaPS survey backed this up: 25% of teachers said they lacked confidence or skills to teach financial topics, and 26% said they didn’t know where to find support or resources.
Other subjects take priority
79% of teachers said other subjects were prioritised over financial education. With pressure on curriculum time, money lessons get squeezed out. The result is that even where financial education exists on paper, it’s often delivered in short, irregular bursts — the 48-minute average per month reflects this. At that rate, a student would need over three years of schooling just to hit the 30-hour minimum researchers recommend.
No financial education after 16
Once students finish GCSEs, financial education stops. There’s no requirement to teach it in sixth forms, colleges, or apprenticeships. That means the 366,000 young people leaving education each year do so with whatever they picked up — or didn’t — by age 16. For those who didn’t receive meaningful financial education, there’s no catch-up built into the system.
Uneven access creates a postcode lottery
Because delivery depends on individual schools and teachers, a student’s financial education can vary dramatically depending on where they live and which school they attend. The APPG has called this a “postcode lottery,” and the data backs it up. In Wales, the 2022 curriculum rollout means primary-age children now get financial education through maths and health and wellbeing. In England, a child in a school that doesn’t prioritise citizenship or maths-based money topics may get almost nothing.
How to fill the gap — what actually works
With the school system falling short, the question becomes what parents, young people, and educators can do to bridge the gap. The research points to several approaches that have shown real results.
Start early and keep it consistent
The MaPS survey found that children who received financial education both at school and at home — just 10% of those surveyed — showed better money management skills and more positive attitudes toward saving. That joined-up approach matters. At home, simple habits like talking about budgeting, involving children in shopping decisions, and setting up a savings jar can build foundations that school lessons reinforce. The Martin Lewis financial textbook is one free resource designed to help parents and teachers start those conversations.
Use free resources designed for schools and families
Several organisations have created materials specifically to fill the gaps in the curriculum. The Open University offers a free personal finance course that covers budgeting, saving, debt, and pensions. MaPS has developed the Talk Money kit for schools, which provides lesson plans and activities. The APPG has recommended creating a national online hub with reliable teaching resources, so teachers don’t have to hunt for materials. For parents, talking about money openly and using everyday situations — like comparing prices at the supermarket or explaining a utility bill — can be just as effective as formal lessons.
Push for financial education in your child’s school
If your child’s school isn’t delivering financial education, you can ask why. The APPG’s 2022 survey found that many teachers simply didn’t know it was a requirement. A polite conversation with the head of citizenship or maths can sometimes be enough to get it on the agenda. Schools can also bring in external providers — organisations like MyBnk deliver workshops in schools, and MaPS funds pilot programmes to test new teaching approaches. The JustAnswer Finance service can also help parents get quick answers to specific money questions they can then pass on to their children.
What’s coming next — the 2030 target and beyond
MaPS has set a target to increase meaningful financial education from 4.8 million children (2020 baseline) to 6.8 million by 2030. It has invested £1.1 million in financial education over the past year, funding research, the Talk Money kit, and new teaching pilots. The UK is also planning to participate in the OECD PISA international study of financial literacy in 2029, which will provide the first large-scale benchmark of how UK students compare globally. The APPG has recommended a financial education youth guarantee and a financial education champion in every school. These are long-term changes, but they signal that the gap is recognised at policy level.
Frequently asked questions about financial education in UK schools
Is financial education compulsory in UK primary schools? ▾
How much time do schools actually spend on financial education? ▾
What age should financial education start? ▾
What can I do if my child’s school doesn’t teach financial education? ▾
Does financial education continue after age 16? ▾
What is the government doing to improve financial education? ▾
The cost of waiting — and what it means for the next generation
The 366,000 young people leaving education each year without key financial skills aren’t just a statistic. They’re the ones who will take on their first job, open their first bank account, and face their first financial decisions without the tools to make them well. The MaPS survey found that children who received meaningful financial education showed better day-to-day money management and more positive attitudes toward saving. Those who didn’t are more likely to struggle with debt, miss payments, and miss out on the benefits of saving early. The gap isn’t closing fast enough — the proportion of children receiving meaningful financial education actually dropped from 48% in 2019 to 47% in 2022. The 2030 target of 6.8 million children is ambitious, but it will take more than targets to close a gap that starts in primary school and compounds through every financial decision that follows.
Remember: this article is general information only. For advice on your specific situation, speak to a qualified professional.
If this was useful, you might also want to read Building a Financial Safety Net: Essential for Every UK Household.
Sources and Further Reading
Investing for Beginners: A Simple Guide for UK First-Timers — A practical starting point for anyone who missed financial education at school and wants to build investing knowledge from scratch.
Lords Library (2024). Financial education in schools. 🔗
Compare the Market / MyBnk (2023). Financial education in schools. 🔗
Money and Pensions Service (2024). Hundreds of thousands leaving school without money skills. 🔗
Money Wellness (2024). Financial education in UK schools still falling short, says report. 🔗
